We could also call this one "Skeptics on Wikipedia" or "The Science Police"; both of these (academic or medical) clowns should be using their brains and skills within their own fields, but instead they are wasting time arguing with non-scientists and non-doctors on Wikipedia, though we are beginning to understand that the doctor actually gets off on arguing/ganging up on dissenters/banning people. The fight is why these two remain on Wikipedia; if they were actually interested in presenting skeptical views of the "pseudoscience", both
Mathsci and
MastCell would have decamped to RationalWiki long ago.
The Mathematician: Antony John Wassermann
Wassermann (b. 1957) is a British
mathematician who lives in Cambridge, England. He is the son of Gerhard Dietrich Wassermann, a mathematician and parapsychologist; his mother is Bertha Edith Weiss, whom G.D. Wassermann married in 1948. Antony Wassermann went to Royal Grammar School in Newcastle upon Tyne for his elementary education, and received his Ph.D at the University of Pennsylvania in 1981, studying under Jonathan Micah Rosenberg. All that I just wrote was found out by
Captain Occam (Jonathan Kane); according to him, A.J. Wassermann
hasn't published since 1998 which Kane didn't understand. An unspoken rule of thumb of mathematicians is that you see fewer and fewer papers from them as they get older; the flame of genius burns out, and they just teach the shiny new things. The great irony of Wassermann being
Mathsci on Wikipedia is that there isn't even a stub article on Antony John Wassermann, even though he was a Miller Research Fellowship recipient in 1986-88, winner of the Whitehead Prize in 1990, and allegedly an expert on
the Baum-Connes conjecture, but nothing he wrote on it was mentioned in the Wikipedia article.
Wassermann became
Mathsci in 2006, though his early history (like most of the real pissants of Wikipedia) was retroactively screwed with by his friends. And his friends are such august figures as
Herr Doktor Lukas Pietsch (
Future Perfect at Sunrise), Charles Matthews of Wikimedia UK, and
MastCell, who protected him like the Turkish heavy artillery did Aqaba harbor in 1917, because
Mathsci was endlessly useful as a "meatpuppet." A quote from
Cla68 (Charles Ainsworth), March 2013:
"One interesting aspect of the Mathsci Steamroller is the protection he gets from a select group of admins. Future Perfect and MastCell are academics like he is. If you can find some real-life connection between them, even if it's just social such as being friends on Google+, then that will make the narrative more compelling. The deeper, core problem that the Mathsci Steamroller hits on, IMO, is the use of Wikipedia by activist, agenda-driven editors. Future, MastCell, Mathsci, the global warming gang (not cabal:)), etc are mostly minor academic types or wannabees who apparently feel compelled to use Wikipedia to spread their message because they feel their opinions have not been sufficiently heeded by the general public." The name
Mathsci came from AMS Mathscinet, a search system for academic publications that is subscription-only. It would be like if an archaeologist used the Wikipedia handle
JSTOR_Jones. The one truly decent thing about Wassermann on Wikipedia (beyond his math and classical music articles) is that he never ran for administrator.
The major dogfight
Mathsci was involved in was the Race and Intelligence clusterfuck aka "Japanese People are the Master Race." As the reader can tell, I am neither interested nor offended by this quasi-scientific, quasi-racist timewaster, but
Mathsci was, so we have to write about it, dammit. The Wikipedians who were pro-heredity were:
Captain Occam,
Varoon Arya aka
Aryman,
David.Kane aka
Ephery,
Mikemikev, and
Mirade aka
Acadēmica Orientālis. Opposing them and supporting the "environmental" position were:
Ramdrake,
Mathsci,
Hipocrite (Robert Djurdjevic),
WeijiBaikeBianji,
ArtifexMayhem, and
Volunteer Marek. Then there were the intermediate people who thought the environmentalists were bullying the hereditarians, but mostly backed the environmental position:
Ludwigs2,
Vecrumba,
Maunus, and
VsevolodKrolikov.
Mathsci was accused of numerous underhanded dealings during five years Race and Intelligence was in
Arbitration and before that; when it first went up to Arbitration in 2009,
Mathsci threw a fit claiming that
Reubzz, the mediator "wasn't professional enough."
Reubzz quit. In 2011 he followed
Mirade around
undoing everything he wrote, then claimed Mirade had a "real name" account on Deviant Art, never mind that he was gunning after the wrong target. In 2010,
Rvcx quit Wikipedia after the Race and Intelligence Arbitration ended with
Mathsci not being thrown out on his ear;
Rvcx told
Captain Occam this in a private email:
"My reason for requesting the arbitration was to try to find *someone* with admin privileges who was willing to stand up for Wikipedia's professed principles, and the general notion of collaborative editing. In fact the ruling has made abundantly clear that ArbCom endorses Wikipedia as not an encyclopedia project, but a reputation economy: Mathsci has purchased the right to abuse other editors—and in fact rewrite ArbCom findings at the last minute when it's clear which way the votes are swinging—by spending so much of his time editing. As has been said about Wikipedia so many times by so many others, it's game where the most persistent editors with the most time to invest inevitably win.....Like several others have made clear through this case, I have more important things to do in life than play such a game. I have an academic career to pursue (with, quite frankly, far more significance than Mathsci's mathematical hobbies; we have names for faculty who exploit tenure without significant research contributions) and have no interest in a version of Farmville in which mainspace edits take the place of crop-watering." So that made
Reubzz,
Rvcx, and
Distributivejustice the three editors
Mathsci chased off in three-four years; that has to be some kind of record. As for the 2011
Mirade stalking the following exchange occurred:
Miradre:
Talk: Cultural_anthropology "Please respect my privacy."
Mathsci:
Talk: Cultural_anthropology "Ha, ha, ha, ha."
Miradre:
Talk: Cultural_anthropology "You have already been cautioned against such incivil remarks."
Mathsci:
Talk: Cultural_anthropology "Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha."
The problem with explaining
Mathsci's horrible behavior is that
there is so much of it; my source had
forty pages of material with links.....he was abusive from day one with
Syrran (Gianni Giachetta) whom he chased off and then openly named on the 26th of August, 2006. So that actually makes four editors he chased off. And we haven't even gotten to the sockpuppets; he both investigated other people for sockpuppets while running his own socks,
Aixoise and
P0CF1A, of which most of the information about them was deleted; notice the name of the first, a French term for an inhabitant of Aix, a
commune in Southern France. Guess who has a residence in Aix-en-Provance, the university city? Luckily for us he finally smashed too many toes with a sledgehammer because they blocked him at the end of 2013, then banned him outright in October 2014.....during the ban period, he actually had the chutzpah to send
Rschweib unsolicited emails on the
algebraic mutation article! He also edited his own talk page under the ban. A textbook Wiki-junkie if there ever was one.
A long comment from my source's material:
"Apart from the group of admins
who've used their tools in unusual ways to protect Mathsci, there are a few
long-term patterns which are worth noting here. The first is how his misconduct
has been basically constant for the past four years, despite all of the
warnings he's received, the times that arbitrators expressed certainty that his
conduct would improve, and the times he promised this himself. During this
period he's twice promised to disengage from RI disputes (once in December 2010
and once in April 2012), and broken that promise shortly afterward; he's twice
been sanctioned or admonished by ArbCom (once in August 2010 and once in May
2012); he's been warned three times by individual arbitrators (Risker in April
2011, Jclemens in December 2011, and SilkTork in May 2012), and arbitrators
have twice decided against taking action about him because they were confident
his conduct was going to improve (Cool Hand Luke in September 2011 and
Newyorkbrad in December 2012), only to have him return to the same conduct a
few months later. This is apart from all of the numerous uninvolved editors and
admins who've asked him to stop or registered their disapproval with him at
various points. The second is the number of
editors who he has one way or another driven away from the project. If we
exclude editors who Mathsci believed to be socks, we have observed nine
examples of this: Reubzz, DistributiveJustice, Rvcx, Varoon Arya, Ludwigs2,
Captain Occam, Ferahgo the Assassin, TrevelyanL85A2, and Deltahedron. With the
possible exception of DistributiveJustice, none of these were single-purpose
accounts, and all but the the first three had nothing to do with Race and Intelligence articles when Mathsci got rid of them. (Deltahedron never edited
in the RI area, at all.) The actual number of people he's
eliminated is probably much higher than nine, because this number doesn't
include editors he got rid of because he thought they were socks, or editors
where this happened without anyone noting it. It also doesn't include editors
who quit the project after being attacked by Mathsci but who never explicitly
stated that he was a reason for their leaving. One example of someone like that
was HPotato, a newbie who disappeared after having an argument with Mathsci in
January 2013:Link.
And the last thing of importance, a large portion of the community seems to be aware of this problem, or at least of some part of it. ArbCom has come very close to doing something about Mathsci on several occasions, and would have done so if not for the lengths gone to by his supporters. In November a majority of arbitrators supported turning the one-way interaction bans into mutual bans, but changed their minds because of Timotheus Canens' threat. In December, at least four arbitrators felt that a full case was needed if someone were to request one in 2013, and ErrantX was planning to request it himself, until (according to ErrantX) Mathsci's supporters forced him out of Wikipedia with their threats against him. In the past year, at least twelve uninvolved editors have urged ArbCom to take some action about Mathsci in the various arbitration threads about him: Silver Seren, Penwhale, Vecrumba, Only in Death, A Quest for Knoweldge, Collect, SB_Johnny, NE Ent, ErrantX, Seraphimblade, Youreallycan, and D. Lazard."
Marta Aseda, Antony Wassermann on piano
or computer,Vaughn Jones in background.
Cropped photo from Los Angeles, 2004.
The Doctor: David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D.
This guy is well-known in the "anti-vaccination" crowd (i.e, the parents of young children terrified that their vaccinated children will become autistic); he used the name
Orac online for years, in fact he still uses it to
blog. He runs a website called Science-Based Medicine where he and other medical doctors rant about what a threat not-immunizing children is;
his personal page on that site is shot through with disclaimers and flimsy financial statements (but he will admit to writing for pay), but the bottom is an overblown "the people on Google are trying to destroy me" rant complete with hidden links making himself out to be the aggrieved party, even though a few paragraphs above he said he got involved in "refuting pseudoscience" on a lark; he has been on the Internet since the 1990s, and yet he has never figured out that people will act like crazed Berserker Vikings online if their precious personal beliefs are attacked, especially if it has to do with their young children. It should be noted that his personal page hasn't changed a lick since 2011.
As with
Mathsci, Dr. Gorski became
MastCell in 2006, the year before Wikipedia began imploding thanks to the
Essjay scandal and
Durova's (Lise Broer) "cyberstalking" secret email list, among other fiascoes. He wrote about cancer drugs like desatnib (aka
BMS-354825 and "Sprycel") and vinblastine (
"Velban"), which gave many the suspicion that MastCell was doing paid editing on Wikipedia for the drug companies, which is an accusation made by his many anti-vaxxer enemies. One of his first edits was to the article on Matthias Rath, a German doctor whose "cancer cure" uses "micronutrients"; MastCell accused him of being an AIDS denialist on top of slamming his system. As with Mathsci, MastCell has his own sockpuppet Jinkinson (popped into being, January 2013) who wrote a BLP of Dr. Gorski in March 2013 using hard-to-find references. He was made an Administrator in 2007, the RfA begun by Durova. Notice that the only dissenter, Wooyi, was browbeaten into supporting Dr. Gorski's appointment. Following in the golem-like footsteps of Mathsci, MastCell has one true redeeming feature: he wants disclaimers at the top of medical articles at Wikipedia. Nobody else at Wikiproject Medicine agrees, so any gibberish can be passed off as medical knowledge on medical pages. Aside from that, he supports all the scumbags Mathsci hung out with so it's like replacing the White Spy with the Black Spy from Antonio Prohías'
Spy vs. Spy cartoons, except that he isn't as much of a thuggish goon like
Ernst Kaltenbrunner-like
Mathsci. It doesn't hurt that he's getting tired of the whole thing:
"I'm sure you're right. I dunno. Wikipedia forces us to choose between playing a primarily "editorial" role or a primarily "administrative" role. It takes a lot of effort to do either one well, and I certainly don't have the time, energy, or interest to try actively fill both roles anymore. And I feel like I have a more important role to play on the administrative side. I've been sort of appalled at the level of attrition among clueful, mature, reality-based people here. I'm even more appalled at what passes for serious discussion of meta-issues and project-level dilemmas.
"And finally, I've dealt with a lot of tendentious axe-grinders and nonsense-peddlers here, and I recognize the corrosive effect that such people have on the time and goodwill of well-meaning editors. I feel an obligation to deal with problem editors in order to preserve the editing environment for people who actually care about creating a reputable online reference work. And because I've got an admin bit (and a lot of hit points, and a solid armor class) I feel especially responsible for taking on these kinds of cases, because not a lot of other admins can or do. After all, anyone can join and edit, but not many people are in a position to deal with problematic situations from an administrative perspective.
"There used to be a group of admins who were smart and had good judgement and could wade into these situations, but their numbers have dwindled to the point that I feel pretty alone in that regard. There really isn't any roadmap for someone like me - I honestly don't know of anyone who's been active as long as I have in editing and adminning primarily controversial topic areas. I've outlived my natural wiki-lifespan.:) I don't think it's as simple as going back to editing articles more, because that's not as fulfilling as it used to be. The people who made this place fun for me are mostly gone, or else they're still here but burnt-out shells of their former wiki-selves. (Present company excluded, of course).:)
"That said, I'd be happy to work on the esophageal cancer article. I'm not sure I'll be able to work on it in a timely fashion; I've been contributing fairly little for a while now because of real-life demands. Anthony, I'll follow up with you by email. Thank you both for the notes—they are genuinely appreciated, and it's always good to hear from both of you. MastCell Talk 04:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)"
